The most recent controversy in our National Parks is one concerning banning the use of lead bullets and sinkers for hunting and fishing in the parks. Supporters argue that the lead is picked up by scavengers and studies on ravens have shown elevated levels of lead in the bloodstream during hunting seasons. However, the possible ban has been widely opposed by sportsmen. After the initial proposal, the Park Service has rephrased the ban to only affect Park personnel, and also calling for hunters and anglers to voluntarily switch to lead-free alternatives.
Senators Barrasso and Enzie from Wyoming stated in a press release last month that a ban would “negatively impact hunters, anglers, conservation groups and manufacturers throughout the country.” Barrasso further elaborated that “hunting and fishing is a way of life in Wyoming. This and other recent restrictions placed on our parks by the Obama administration continue to diminish American traditions and experiences. This ban rejects the stated purpose of our national parks, which is to provide enjoyment and benefit to the public.”
As of yesterday, National Parks director Jon Jarvis says he has no plans to ban lead bullets or fishing tackle in the parks at this point in time. However, he suggested that alternatives are a good option for sportsmen. Jarvis also clarified that the original proposal was focusing on what the Parks Service uses in their own day-to-day operations.
To date, two parks have already asked their hunting and fishing visitors to make the switch to non-lead alternatives: Grand Teton National Park and the National Elk refuge.
Read more about the controversy in the Jackson Hole News & Guide here and here.
-via Backpacker Magazine’s Daily Dirt
